Skip to main content
· 12/9/1997

Sargeant, Donald B. v. Dixon, Harry

Citations

  • 130 F.3d 1067
  • 327 U.S. App. D.C. 274
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 34325

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if a person has “an interest in ‘being heard’ by the grand jury,” it is “only because” he has an “interest in seeing certain persons prosecuted”—which is “not legally cognizable within the framework of Article III” under Linda R.S.
  • if a person has “an interest in ‘being heard’ by the grand jury,” it is “only because” he has an “interest in seeing certain persons prosecuted”— which is “not legally cognizable within the framework of Article III” under Linda R.S.
  • if a person has “an interest in ‘being heard’ by the grand jury,” it is “only because” he has an “interest in seeing certain persons prosecuted”—which is “not legally cognizable within 8 the framework of Article III” under Linda R.S.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.