· 12/23/2009
Saregama India Ltd. v. Mosley
Citations
- 687 F. Supp. 2d 1325
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119389
- 2009 WL 5083424
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Section 114(b) does not seem to support the distinction between sound recordings and all other forms of copyrightable work that the Bridgeport court imposes.”
- critiquing Bridgeport’s interpretive method for a similar reason
- critiquing Bridgeport’s interpretive method for a similar reason
- rejecting Bridgeport’s rule after analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Patria A. Seitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.