Sardo Lace Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[s]ecuritization does not alter the relationship or rights of the parties to the loan” and “does not modify the terms of the underlying obligations”
• quoted with approval in Pope v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp. , 561 F. App'x 569 , 573 (8th Cir. 2014) (unpublished
• “Plaintiffs’ contention that they do not know to whom their debt is owed is not a basis to ‘quiet title.’”
• “Plaintiffs’ contention that they do not know to whom their debt is owed is not a basis to ‘quiet title.’ ”
• “[A] quiet title claim against a mortgagee (or purported servicer of the mortgagee) requires an allegation that Plaintiffs ‘ha[ve] paid, or [are] able to tender, the amount of indebtedness.’” (second and third alterations in original
• “Securitization does not alter the relationship or rights of the parties to the loan, but merely creates a separate contract, distinct from [p]laintiffs[’] debt obligations’ under the note and does not change the relationship of the parties in any way[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).