Sardell v. Malanio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It remains the burden of the petitioners, Sardell, to prove that the act of [the initial negligent actor] was the proximate cause of the injury.”
• A “direct” link must be established “between the negligent act and the injury” so that “it can reasonably be said that but for the act the injury would not have occurred.”
• a “direct” link must be established “between the negligent act and the injury” so that “it can reasonably be said that but for the act the injury would not have occurred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).