Sardanis v. Sumitomo Corp.
Citations
- 279 A.D.2d 225
- 718 N.Y.S.2d 66
- 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 242
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “[f]ederal courts in New York [have] . . . consistently den[ied] a private right of action under the commercial bribery provisions of the Penal Law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wallach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Alfred E. Mann Living Trust v. ETIRC Aviation S.A.R.L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-10-19· cited 32×
- Pramer S.C.A. v. Abaplus International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-06-10· cited 20×
- Minnelli v. SoumayahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-06-28· cited 13×
- Sardanis v. Sumitomo Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-04-19· cited 12×
- Wint v. ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-06-20· cited 8×
- Fernandez v. Univan LeasingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-02-07· cited 5×
- Casa de Cambio Delgado, Inc. v. Casa de Cambio Puebla, S.A. de C.V.New York Supreme Court· 2003-05-07· cited 4×
- New York State Thruway Authority v. FenechAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2012-02-16· cited 2×
- Mutual Benefits Offshore Fund v. ZeltserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-06-07· cited 1×
- New York State Thruway Authority v. FenechNew York Supreme Court· 2010-08-12· cited 1×
- Gouiran Family Trust v. GouiranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-05-17· cited 1×
- Oxbow Calcining USA Inc. v. American Industrial PartnersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2012-06-26· cited 1×
- Miller v. WaltersNew York Supreme Court· 2014-10-09· cited 1×
- Cantarelli S.P.A v. L. Della Cella Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-05-22
- Nicholson v. Aesthetique, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-04-13
- Sbarro, Inc. v. Tukdan Holdings, Ltd.New York Supreme Court· 2011-04-28
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1996-06-13· cited 1,127×
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 735×
- Rocanova v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals· 1994-05-10· cited 506×
- Sheehy v. Big Flats Community Day, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1989-06-06· cited 481×
- Prozeralik v. Capital Cities Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1993-11-23· cited 133×
- Reynolds v. KohAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-06-13· cited 25×
- Low v. WerkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-05-04· cited 21×
- Rissew v. Yamaha Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-05-22· cited 21×
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. FreedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-10-01· cited 20×
- 105 East Second Street Associates v. BorrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-08-22· cited 15×
- PHILIP MORRIS, INCORP. v. Grinnell Lithographic Co.E.D. New York· 1999-09-28· cited 8×
- Cantara v. PeelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-12-30· cited 6×
- Philip v. Monarch Knitting Machinery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-01-29· cited 4×
- Prudential Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1981-12-15· cited 1×
Other cases named Sardanis v. Sumitomo Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.