Sarasky v. Law Enforcement Training & Consulting Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that only evidence of a successful prosecution establishes a realistic probability of prosecution and that a conviction vacated on appeal or evidence regarding the initiation of charges is insufficient
• noting that California Penal Code § 273a(b) “do[es] not require a sufficiently high risk of harm to a child to meet the definition of child abuse, neglect, or abandonment under the [INA]”
• discussing California statute and agreeing that it is not categorically a crime of child abuse
• discussing California statute and agreeing that it is not categorically a crime of child abuse
• “[A]cts creating a likelihood of harm to a child . . . fit within our definition of a ‘crime of child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment.’”
• elements of state child endangerment statute, which included “a knowing mental state coupled with an act or acts creating a likelihood of harm to a child[,] fit within [BIA’s] definition of a ‘crime of child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).