Sarah Fink v. Dakotacare Dakotacare Administrative Services, Inc. Platte Community Memorial Hospital, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the Supreme Court of the United States has held that ERISA’s section 1132(a
• observing that “[t]he fact that [an employer] switched its plan from one group health provider to another may have modified but did not eliminate” the duty under COBRA to provide continuing coverage
• “state law causes of action are completely preempted by ERISA when they arise from the administration of benefits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).