Sarah E. Price v. United States
Syllabus
REPORTED OPINION denying [65] plaintiff&039;s Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony of Mr. Eslava; denying [66] plaintiff&039;s Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony of Mr. Clementi and All Evidence of Plaintiff&039;s 2021 Sale of the Subject Property; denying [67] the government&039;s Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Testimony of Mr. Tatos; denying [68] the government&039;s Motion in Limine to Strike Certain Testimony by Mr. Matthews; denying [69] the government&039;s Motion in Limine to Exclude Mr. Cook; finding as moot [76] plaintiff&039;s Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Witnesses, including Mr. Pace; finding as moot [100] the government&039;s Motion to Strike plaintiff&039;s Reply in support of the Motion in Limine to Strike Eslava as an expert; denying [112] plaintiff&039;s Motion in Limine to Strike Dr. Banzhaf; granting [124] plaintiff&039;s Motion to Sustain Hearsay Objection to Statements Contained within the United States&039; Exhibit 200; awarding plaintiff compensation in the amount of &036;684,429.00, exclusive of interest. The parties SHALL FILE a joint status report by 3/11/2025 jointly proposing an appropriate interest rate and amount, dating back to the date of the taking, and a proposal regarding next steps in this case, including an update on attorneys&039; fees
Judges: Ryan T. Holte
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.