Sarah Barke v. D & D Real Estate Holdings, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the district court’s reversal of the agency’s determination that the issue of liability was fairly debatable, resulting in our total affirmance of the agency’s decision
• finding substantial evidence that claimant had “not truly returned to work, and . . . had not achieved maximum medical improvement” where the employee was returned to work by doctor but was essentially working while injured
• stating if our conclusions align with the district court, we affirm
• warehouse employee injured by falling onto a forklift
• warehouse employee injured by falling onto a forklift

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).