· 4/18/2016
Saracino v. United States
Citations
- 136 S. Ct. 1697
- 194 L. Ed. 2d 797
- 84 U.S.L.W. 3586
- 2016 U.S. LEXIS 2561
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a prisoner’s First Amendment and ADA claims were barred because the prisoner “did not exhaust his administrative remedies”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.