· 10/29/2003
Sara Sirotzky v. New York Stock Exchange and Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., Inc.
Citations
- 347 F.3d 985
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 22100
- 2003 WL 22442988
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[P]rovided removal was improper, the plaintiff is pre- sumptively entitled to an award of fees.”
- “[P]rovided removal was im- proper, the plaintiff is presumptively entitled to an award of fees.”
- “[P]laintiff must show the remand order was correct (that is, that removal was improper) . . .”
- “the amount-in-controversy requirement is not satisfied when a plaintiff petitions a federal court to vacate an arbitration award of less than $75,000, at least where the plaintiff refrains from seeking a rehearing to pursue a previously-arbitrated claim in excess of $75,000.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Posner, Manion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.