Skip to main content
· 10/29/2003

Sara Sirotzky v. New York Stock Exchange and Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 347 F.3d 985
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 22100
  • 2003 WL 22442988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[P]rovided removal was improper, the plaintiff is pre- sumptively entitled to an award of fees.”
  • “[P]rovided removal was im- proper, the plaintiff is presumptively entitled to an award of fees.”
  • “[P]laintiff must show the remand order was correct (that is, that removal was improper) . . .”
  • “the amount-in-controversy requirement is not satisfied when a plaintiff petitions a federal court to vacate an arbitration award of less than $75,000, at least where the plaintiff refrains from seeking a rehearing to pursue a previously-arbitrated claim in excess of $75,000.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Posner, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.