Sara Mussie v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[o]nce the INS met its burden of introducing some evidence indicating that[petitioner] had been ‘firmly resettled’ in Germany, [the petitioner] bore the burden of demonstrating, by a preponderance of the evidence, that she had not been resettled”
• holding that “[o]nce the INS met its burden of introducing some evidence indicating that [peti- tioner] had been ‘firmly resettled’ in Germany, [the peti- tioner] bore the burden of demonstrating, by a preponderance of the evidence, that she had not been resettled”
• finding firm resettlement for Ethiopian national who had lived in Germany for two years with German travel documentation, government assistance, a job, and an apartment
• upholding finding that petitioner firmly resettled in Germany where she lived for six years and received government assistance, worked, paid taxes and rented an apartment
• denying petition for review upon a finding of firm resettlement in part based on six-year stay in third country, receipt of government assistance, and renting of per sonal apartment
• petitioner lived in Germany for six years, received government assistance for school, rent and food, held a job and paid taxes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).