Sar v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Ethereal or emotional rewards, such as love and affection, do not qualify as value for purposes of defeating a constructive fraudulent conveyance claim.”
• Ponzi scheme presumption did not apply to transfers of tuition money by known Ponzi schemers to daughter's university because the transfers were not made \with actual intent to defraud their creditors\ notwithstanding guilty pleas on investment fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).