· 3/22/2010
Saputra v. Holder
Citations
- 176 L. Ed. 2d 381
- 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2548
- 130 S. Ct. 1905
- 559 U.S. 1016
- 78 U.S.L.W. 3547
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “This actual-litigation requirement for the application of collateral estoppel is explained in 1 Restatement of the Law 2d, Judgments (1982) 256–257, Section 27, Comment e[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.