Skip to main content
· 9/5/1891

Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park Railroad

Citations

  • 91 Cal. 48
  • 27 P. 590
  • 1891 Cal. LEXIS 1048

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “decision” as used in OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1
  • contrasting lawsuits challenging the legislative decision underlying the enactment of a development code with suits seeking individualized zoning-related relief
  • explaining that “decision” as used in OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1
  • “enactment of a new development code is an exercise of legislative power—and thus not an adjudicative ‘decision’” requiring discretionary review
  • “The enactment of ordinances is at the core of the City Council’s legislative functions.”
  • city’s adoption of a new development code was legislative, rather than adjudicatory, in nature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.