· 9/5/1891
Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park Railroad
Citations
- 91 Cal. 48
- 27 P. 590
- 1891 Cal. LEXIS 1048
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “decision” as used in OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1
- contrasting lawsuits challenging the legislative decision underlying the enactment of a development code with suits seeking individualized zoning-related relief
- explaining that “decision” as used in OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1
- “enactment of a new development code is an exercise of legislative power—and thus not an adjudicative ‘decision’” requiring discretionary review
- “The enactment of ordinances is at the core of the City Council’s legislative functions.”
- city’s adoption of a new development code was legislative, rather than adjudicatory, in nature
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.