Sapp v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence was sufficient to deny motion for directed verdict where appellant was seen in a security camera recording near where the victim was found, and appellant appeared nervous and sweaty and changed clothes after the murder
• “While mere presence at the scene of the crime is not sufficient evidence to convict one of being a party to a crime, criminal intent may be inferred from presence, companionship, and conduct before, during and after the offense.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
• “While mere presence at the scene of the crime is not sufficient evidence to convict one of being a party to a crime, criminal intent may be inferred from presence, companionship, and conduct before, during and after the offense.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McGRUDER v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-05-07· cited 35×
• Muckle v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-12-11· cited 20×
• Battle v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-08-14· cited 18×
• Shelton v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2022-02-15· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Hayes v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-03-04· cited 135×
• Thomas v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-01-23· cited 34×
• Belsar v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-02-24· cited 20×