Sapp v. Kimbrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that administrative remedies are effectively unavailable when prison officials fail to respond to a properly filed grievance
• holding that “improper screening of an inmate’s administrative grievances renders administrative remedies ‘effectively unavailable’ such that exhaustion is not required”
• holding that “[a]dministrative remedies were … ‘available’” when 10 plaintiff’s appeals were “screened for proper reasons,” and plaintiff “was required to exhaust 11 them”
• holding that “improper screening of an inmate’s administrative grievances renders administrative remedies ‘effectively unavailable’ such that exhaustion is not required under the PLRA”
• holding that “improper screening of an inmate’s administrative grievances renders administrative remedies ‘effectively unavailable’ such that exhaustion is not required under the PLRA”
• holding that a prison’s improper screening of a grievance 18 renders administrative remedies effectively unavailable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).