Sapinder Singh v. Larry Fowler Trucking, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an appellate court cannot determine whether an error was harmful “without knowing what the excluded evidence would have been”
• noting that an offer of proof is not necessary when the substance of the evidence and its reason for exclusion are apparent from the context
• explaining that an appellate court reviews a trial court’s ruling on a motion in limine under an abuse of discretion standard
• applying the abuse of discretion standard to determine whether the trial court erred in excluding deposition testimony
• applying the abuse of discretion standard to determine whether the trial court erred in excluding deposition testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).