· 2/8/1967
Sanza v. Maryland State Board of Censors
Citations
- 226 A.2d 317
- 245 Md. 319
- 1967 Md. LEXIS 522
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing a film censorship statute, broad on its face, to apply only to “films and views to be shown for an admission charge, except when shown by public associations or institutions which do not operate for profit,” so as to bring the statute within federal constitutional limits
- although censorship statute defined \film” and \view” in broad terms which would literally require a license for a person exhibiting a home movie of his children or for a store selling a scenic slide, the statute was construed as applicable only to films shown commercially for profit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barnes, Hammond, Horney, Marbury, McWilliams, Oppenheimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.