Santucci v. Dufficy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• This Court notes that at the time of the interrogation, Dearstyne was only sixteen-years-old.
• on direct appeal, finding no violation “because the claimed Brady material was not exculpatory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).