Santos v. Cuba Tropical, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a no-poach agreement between two technology companies sufficed to state a horizontal market allocation agreement
• explaining that determining whether an agreement is naked or ancillary is a factual inquiry requiring “evidence relating to the agreement’s formation and character”
• “A plaintiff is the master of its complaint and may choose which claims to allege.”
• \A plaintiff is the master of its complaint and may choose which claims to allege.\
• “At this stage in this action, the court simply cannot determine with certainty the nature of the restraint, and by extension, the level of analysis to apply.”
• “At this stage in this action, the court simply cannot determine with certainty the nature of the restraint, and by extension, the level of analysis to apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).