Santos v. Chater

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that the review process ran past March 1996 should not deprive plaintiff of benefits that a timely, correct decision would have given him.”
• “The fact that the review process ran past March 1996 should not deprive plaintiff of benefits a timely, correct decision would have given him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).