Santos Reyes v. The Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting legislative history of § 202(d)(1)(B)(ii), indicating that “Congress intended to provide benefits for children who were permanently disabled prior to age 18 [now 22] and have remained so continuously to the present time.”
• affirming ALJ’s denial of child’s disability benefits when the record had “no clinical, diagnostic evidence as to the claimant’s disease prior to age 18 [now 22]” and “absolutely no objective evidence of claimant’s disability” over a 30 year period after age 18 [now 22]
• no intention to apply social security laws extraterritorially

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).