Santos Cruz v. David Miller, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e are determining the reasonableness of the state courts’ 10 ‘decision’ . . . not grading their papers.”
• “[T]he [Supreme] Court has not explicitly considered what circumstances of a Terry stop would constitute ‘custody’ requiring Miranda warnings.”
• “the intricacies of the state court’s analysis need not concern us; what matters is whether the decision the court reached was contrary to controlling federal law”
• “the intricacies of the state court’s analysis need not concern us; what matters is whether the decision the court reached was contrary to controlling federal law”
• “[W]e are determining the reasonableness of the state courts’ 10 ‘decision’ . . . not grading their papers.”
• “the intricacies of the state court’s analysis need not concern us; what matters is whether the decision the court reached was contrary to controlling federal law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).