· 6/22/2007
Santoro v. State
Citations
- 959 So. 2d 1235
- 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9583
- 2007 WL 1790757
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defense counsel provided by insurer owes exclusive duty of loyalty to insured
- “[W]e have long held that even when an insurer retains an attorney in order to defend a suit against an insured, the attorney’s only allegiance is to the client, the insured.” (emphasis in origi nal)
- ‘‘we have long held that even when an insurer retains an attorney in order to defend a suit against an insured, the attorney’s only allegiance is to the client, the insured’’ (emphasis in original)
- defense counsel provided by insurer owes exclusive duty of loyalty to insured
- construing finality requirement of General Statutes § 52-263
- order protecting discovery documents deemed interlocutory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edward, Larose, Northcutt, Threadgill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.