Skip to main content
· 6/22/2007

Santoro v. State

Citations

  • 959 So. 2d 1235
  • 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9583
  • 2007 WL 1790757

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defense counsel provided by insurer owes exclusive duty of loyalty to insured
  • “[W]e have long held that even when an insurer retains an attorney in order to defend a suit against an insured, the attorney’s only allegiance is to the client, the insured.” (emphasis in origi nal)
  • ‘‘we have long held that even when an insurer retains an attorney in order to defend a suit against an insured, the attorney’s only allegiance is to the client, the insured’’ (emphasis in original)
  • defense counsel provided by insurer owes exclusive duty of loyalty to insured
  • construing finality requirement of General Statutes § 52-263
  • order protecting discovery documents deemed interlocutory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edward, Larose, Northcutt, Threadgill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.