· 10/31/1961
Santoro v. Osman
Citations
- 149 Conn. 9
- 174 A.2d 800
- 1961 Conn. LEXIS 248
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- note executed and payable in New York was governed by New York law
- \mere fact that a type of conduct is prohibited in Connecticut by a statute carrying a substantial criminal penalty . . . does not establish that such conduct is contrary to a `deep-rooted public policy' in this state\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldwin, King, Murphy, Alcorn, MacDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.