Skip to main content
· 10/31/1961

Santoro v. Osman

Citations

  • 149 Conn. 9
  • 174 A.2d 800
  • 1961 Conn. LEXIS 248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • note executed and payable in New York was governed by New York law
  • \mere fact that a type of conduct is prohibited in Connecticut by a statute carrying a substantial criminal penalty . . . does not establish that such conduct is contrary to a `deep-rooted public policy' in this state\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldwin, King, Murphy, Alcorn, MacDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.