Santistevan v. City of Colorado Springs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• focusing upon defendant’s discriminatory conduct and not individual factual determinations regarding class members’ individual claims in determining that typicality was satisfied
• current and former employees of bank alleging bank has pervasive pattern and practice of discriminating against African Americans under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e
• “individuals with time- barred claims may not be included within a proposed class”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).