Santini v. Herman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• quashing for lack of jurisdiction a D.C. Superior Court subpoena for documents brought against the United States Attorney’s Office
• refusing to review the federal agency’s denial of documents as the movant had not filed a proper suit in federal court seeking such review
• “This Court is without jurisdiction to enforce a Superior Court subpoena against the federal government.”
• “In state court, sovereign immunity shields the federal government, thereby preventing the state court from enforcing a subpoena.”
• “Whether a plaintiff seeks testimony or the production of documents from an agency, [the plaintiff] must comply with the agency’s Touhy regulations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).