Santillan v. Henao

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff can meet their burden of showing that they performed work that was not properly compensated “by relying on recollection alone”
• explaining that “New York’s Labor Law is the state analogue to the federal FLSA” and that, aside from the FLSA’s requirement for a nexus with interstate commerce and an employer’s required amount of sales, the NYLL “otherwise mirrors” the FLSA
• determining prejudgment interest as the “midway point between when plaintiff[s] began and ceased working for defendant[s]” (alterations in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• determining prejudgment interest as the “midway point between when plaintiff[s] began and ceased working for defendant[s].” (alterations in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• determining prejudgment interest as the “midway point between when plaintiff[s] began and ceased working for defendant[s].” (alterations in original) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).