· 6/4/1990
Santiago v. Temple University
Citations
- 739 F. Supp. 974
- 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1465
- 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1600
- 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6718
- 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,217
- 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1514
- 1990 WL 82198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- an employee of any status cannot be qualified for his position if he is unable to attend the workplace, because attendance is necessarily the fundamental prerequisite to job qualification
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newcomer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.