Skip to main content
· 12/17/2001

Santiago v. Miller

Citations

  • 180 F. Supp. 2d 471
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20925
  • 2001 WL 1622199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • petitioner’s legal blindness was not a sufficient reason to toll the limitations period because the condition did not truly prevent him from pursuing his legal rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buchwald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.