Santiago v. Meinsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an inmate incarcerated in a state correctional facility failed to exhaust his administrative remedies because, among other reasons, he did not pursue his claim with the appropriate grievance committee
• dismissing case so that inmate could seek extension of time to file grievance
• “[E]xhaustion requirement applies even where the plaintiff is seeking money damages which are not available at the inmate grievance level.”
• “[P]ersonal involvement of defendants in alleged constitutional deprivations is a prerequisite to an award of damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”
• “[P]ersonal involvement of defendants in alleged constitutional deprivations is a prerequisite to an award of damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”
• “[P]ersonal involvement of defendants in alleged constitutional deprivations is a prerequisite to an award of damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).