Santiago v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was appropriate to recognize a duty of care on the part of the drug testing laboratory and would have allowed the plaintiff to proceed with a negligence claim had there been any evidence of negligence in the testing process
• plaintiffʹs urine sample tested positive for cocaine while contained in bottle on which plaintiffʹs signature had been forged
• “Drug screens are plagued by the problems of ‘cross-reactivity’—namely, the familiar concern that metabolites of benign consumables, like poppy seed muffins, will be confused with metabolites of illicit substances[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).