Santiago, etc. v. Canon, U.S.A., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that party normally may not raise new issues in post-judgment motion for reconsideration
• refusing to consider theory different from that presented to magistrate judge
• “The object of [former] [Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e) ] “is not to replace conclusory allegations of thé complaint... with conclusory allegations of an affidavit”
• “The district court is under no obligation to discover or articulate new legal theories for a party challenging a report and recommendation issued by a magistrate judge.
• \The district court is under no obligation to discover or articulate new legal theories for a party challenging a report and recommendation issued by a magistrate judge.\
• “The district court is under no obligation to discover or articulate new legal theories for a party challenging a report and recommendation issued by a magistrate judge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).