Skip to main content
· 9/6/2001

Santi v. Santi

Citations

  • 633 N.W.2d 312
  • 2001 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 145
  • 2001 WL 1035932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “ ‘the parenting right is a fundamental liberty interest that is protected against unwarranted state intrusion’ ” and subjecting a statute authorizing a court to override a parental decision about grandparent visitation to strict scrutiny (italics omitted
  • holding grandparent visitation statute unconstitutional as applied to married parents because it did not require a determination of parental unfitness
  • considering whether a law “strengthen[ed] extended familial bonds” or caused “family disruption” in deciding á constitutional challenge to a statute
  • finding the grandparent visitation statute unconstitutional where the statute failed to require a threshold finding of parental unfitness
  • fostering close relations between grandparents and grandchildren is not a compelling state interest
  • “This court has likewise acknowledged this parental caretaking interest as fundamental.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neuman, Snell, Streit

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.