Santella v. Kolton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to review a final order issuing a mandatory injunction when other claims remained pending in the circuit court and the circuit court had not made a Rule 304(a) finding
• appellate court “must determine whether each aspect of the circuit court’s order appealed by defendant is subject to review under Rule 307(a)(1)”
• even though there was no jurisdiction under Rule 307(a)(1), the appellant could seek a Rule 304(a) finding from the trial court, which would provide jurisdiction over the appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Royal Oak Condominium Ass'n v. Stevenson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2025-11-25· cited 6×
• Legacy Re, Ltd. v, 401 Properties, Ltd. Partnership
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2023-05-19· cited 5×
• Beyer v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2019-12-27· cited 4×
• In re L.T.P.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2026-01-12

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re a Minor
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-03-22· cited 308×
• Wangelin v. Goe
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1869-06-15· cited 66×
• Steel City Bank v. Village of Orland Hills
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-12-30· cited 35×
• Hamilton v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-11-24· cited 29×
• Wick v. Wick
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1960-05-18· cited 28×
• Smith v. Goldstick
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-11-05· cited 26×
• Artoe v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-02-03· cited 14×

Other cases named Santella v. Kolton

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Santella v. Kolton
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2018-03-21