Santella v. Andrews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distributor’s requirement that newspapers be delivered by a certain hour amounts to nothing more than general supervisory control which is insufficient to establish an employer-employee relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chuchuca v. Chuchuca
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-11-24· cited 13×
• Kavulak v. Laimis Juodzevicius, A.V. Inc.
  W.D. New York· 2014-01-13· cited 6×
• Smith v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-12-06· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1985-12-19· cited 368×
• Kleeman v. Rheingold
  New York Court of Appeals· 1993-05-04· cited 300×
• Rosenberg v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
  New York Court of Appeals· 1992-06-11· cited 137×
• Kavanaugh v. Nussbaum
  New York Court of Appeals· 1988-03-29· cited 113×
• Lazo v. Mak's Trading Co.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1994-10-27· cited 35×
• Sawh v. Schoen
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-05-23· cited 33×
• Lazo v. Mak's Trading Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-12-21· cited 16×