Santana v. New York City Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• alteration and USCA11 Case: 23-11086 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 02/15/2024 Page: 10 of 17 10 Opinion of the Court 23-11086 internal quotation marks omitted
• “Generally speaking, a duty of care exists under maritime law when injury is foreseea- ble ….” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition is “not a memory test”
• applying same stand- ard in maritime context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).