Skip to main content
· 1/31/1983

Santana v. Fenton

Citations

  • 570 F. Supp. 760
  • 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \we read [section N.C.G.S. § 1109(f)] to require the trial court to affirmatively state in its order the standard of proof utilized in the termination proceeding\
  • holding \we read [section N.C.G.S. § 1109(f)] to require the trial court to affirmatively state in its order the standard of proof utilized in the termination proceeding\
  • “[T]he case must be remanded for the trial court to determine whether the evidence satisfies the required standard of proof . . . .”
  • “[T]he case must be remanded for the trial court to determine whether the evidence satisfies the required standard of proof . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biunno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.