Santana v. Department of Juvenile Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that provisions like § 47a-43 “were designed to protect . . . peaceable possession . . . from disturbance . . . and to protect the peace of the neighborhood” [citation omitted; emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted]
• noting that provisions like § 47a-43 were designed to protect . . . peaceable possession . . . from disturbance . . . and to protect the peace of the neighborhood . . . .” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.
• a violation of CUTPA may be established by showing \either an actual deceptive practice or a practice amounting to a violation of public policy\
• “A subset of unfair practices, recognized by our Supreme Court, is deceptive practices”
• defendant's dismantling of plaintiff's mobile home for off-site storage violated CUTPA
• dismantling of mobile home rather than commencing summary process action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).