Santana v. Cook County Board of Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that conversion of motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment was proper where “[t]he parties had ample notice . . . [and] time to respond”
• explaining that reputational harm without a direct link to injury to business or property is not a cognizable RICO claim
• holding document is incorporated into the complaint if it is “central to the plaintiffs’ claim,” and it is “concededly authentic” (quoting Hecker v. Deere & Co., 556 F.3d 575, 582 (7th Cir. 2009))
• denying leave to amend where plaintiff failed to allege how it is possible for the defendant to identify the plaintiff’s clients
• noting a trial court risks reversible error where it actually considers materials outside the pleadings without converting a motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment (quoting Gen. Elec. Capital v. Lease Resol. Corp., 128 F.3d 1074, 1080 (7th Cir. 1997))
• noting a trial court risks reversible error where it actually considers materials outside the pleadings without converting a motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment (quoting Gen. Elec. Capital v. Lease Resol. Corp., 128 F.3d 1074, 1080 (7th Cir. 1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).