Santana Baez, Iris a v. Gonzalez Aponte, Jose M

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an official may be entitled to qualified immunity if the facts show that the plaintiff has been deprived of a constitutional right and that the right was clearly established at the time of the deprivation
• explaining the “legal/factual dichotomy affecting jurisdiction” on appeal from an order denying qualified immunity
• remanding “because the [district court’s] analysis [was] so scant that [the appellate court was] unable to discern if the district court even applied both steps of the qualified immunity inquiry to all of the summary judgment claims”
• remanding when the district court’s analysis was “so scant” that this Court was “unable to discern if the district court even applied both steps of the qualified immunity inquiry to all of the summary judgment claims”
• remanding a summary judgment order “for a more detailed qualified immunity analysis”
• remanding a summary judgment order “for a more detailed qualified immunity analysis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).