Skip to main content
· 1/18/1985

Santaly v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Citations

  • 600 F. Supp. 825
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23317

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • showing that convenience did not militate against transfer because six of the seven defendants did not even live in state, much less in the transferring division, and four of the witnesses were in jail
  • showing that convenience did not militate against transfer because six of the seven defendants did not even live in state, much less in the transferring division, and four of the witnesses were in jail
  • no time specified, but failure to respond for \reasonable time\
  • no time specified, but failure to respond for “reasonable time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.