Santagate v. Pennsylvania Higher Edn. Assistance Agency
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3153
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in granting PHEAA's motion for summary judgment on Santagate's breach of contract claim based on a theory of third-party beneficiary, in concluding Santagate was not in privity with PHEAA, or in dismissing Santagate's claims for violation of the CSPA, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment. However, the trial court erred in granting PHEAA's motion to dismiss Santagate's fraud-based claims that alleged affirmative misrepresentations by PHEAA.
Judges: Luper Schuster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.