Skip to main content
· 6/10/1994

Santa Fe Pacific Corporation v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund

Citations

  • 22 F.3d 725
  • 1994 WL 143539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that avoiding withdrawal liability “needn’t be the only purpose; it need only have been one of the factors that weighed heavily in the seller’s thinking”
  • reversing an arbitrator’s decision, even though arbitrator found three times that avoidance of withdrawal liability was not a principal purpose of a sale
  • an employer should be let “off the hook even if one of his purposes was to beat withdrawal liabili ty, provided however that it was a minor, subordinate purpose, as distinct from a major purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Eschbach, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.