Sanna v. DiPaulo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an evidentiary hearing, written opinion by the superior court judge, and a direct appeal to the SJC. was sufficient to find full and fair litigation of Fourth Amendment claim
• suggesting that only witness credibility and recitals of external events qualify as basic or primary facts for purposes of section 2254(d)(2)
• finding arguably erroneous intoxication instruction harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because defendant premised his trial defense on mistaken identity
• noting, that subsection (e)(1)’s presumption of correctness standard applies only to “basic, primary, or historical facts”
• requiring attorneys’ fees sought by putative class pursuant to 14 California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act to be divided among all members of the 15 putative class for calculating the $75,000 amount in controversy
• alleging unconstitutional warrantless arrest, transgression of Miranda rights, and improper jury instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).