First Circuit· 9/10/2001

Sanna v. DiPaulo

Citations

265 F.3d 1
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19969
2001 WL 1013148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an evidentiary hearing, written opinion by the superior court judge, and a direct appeal to the SJC. was sufficient to find full and fair litigation of Fourth Amendment claim
suggesting that only witness credibility and recitals of external events qualify as basic or primary facts for purposes of section 2254(d)(2)
finding arguably erroneous intoxication instruction harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because defendant premised his trial defense on mistaken identity
noting, that subsection (e)(1)’s presumption of correctness standard applies only to “basic, primary, or historical facts”
requiring attorneys’ fees sought by putative class pursuant to 14 California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act to be divided among all members of the 15 putative class for calculating the $75,000 amount in controversy
alleging unconstitutional warrantless arrest, transgression of Miranda rights, and improper jury instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Torruella, Selya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.