Sanjata v. Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court had both subject matter jurisdiction and authority to enter order releasing third-party claims
• holding that all matters related to plan confirmation and enforcement are core
• concluding 11 U.S.C. § 1123(a)(4) permits separate classification of similar claims where the class receiving lesser treatment assents
• holding that while Chapter 11 plan might implicate numerous claims, including claims affected by plan's third-party releases, \the merits of\ such claims \are not in controversy\ and \[c]onfirmation of a plan is not an adjudication of the various disputes it touches upon\
• finding “the Master Mortgage factors ... useful considerations in assessing the propriety of a proposed release”
• “Section 1129(a)(2) permits the court to revisit the adequacy of disclosure in light of what is known at confirmation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).