Sangster v. Albertson's, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding federal courts follow the state’s intermediate appellate courts absent convincing evidence the state supreme court would decide differently
• “The 18 Glasgow formulation of the elements of sexual harassment is taken from federal cases 19 interpreting Title VII.”
• “Summary judgment should rarely be granted in employment discrimination cases.”
• \Summary judgment should rarely be granted in employment discrimination cases.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).