Skip to main content
· 9/28/2006

Sanger v. Dennis

Citations

  • 148 P.3d 404
  • 180 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2838
  • 2006 Colo. App. LEXIS 1619
  • 2006 WL 2773023

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because the record supported the district court’s findings , the court didn’t abuse its discretion by granting the preliminary injunction
  • in as-applied challenge, statute must be unconstitutional in the circumstances in which the plaintiff has acted or proposed to act
  • “ A preliminary injunction is considered to be a final order an d is appealable under C.A.R. 1(a)(3) .”
  • grant of injunctive relief is considered a final, appealable order
  • discussing “opt in” versus “opt out” rules of procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothenberg, Casebolt, Bernard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.