Sang v. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[t]he polestar by which courts in Ohio * * * have been guided is the best interest of the child to be adopted\
• permitting homosexual man to adopt emotionally disturbed, brain-damaged child with leukemia whom he had counseled for several years
• permitting homosexual man to adopt emotionally disturbed, brain-damaged child with leukemia whom he had counseled for several years
• permitting homosexual man to adopt emotionally disturbed, brain-damaged child with leukemia whom he had counseled for several years
• “adoption matters must be decided . . . through the able exercise of discretion by the trial court giving due PAGE 4 OF 11 Case No. 2025-P-0012 consideration to all known factors”
• homosexuality of father not per se grounds for denial of adoption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).